Author: silasfong

  • There is No Time

    Solo Exhibition
    Hong-ti Art Center, Busan
    25 Nov 2016– 16 Dec 2016

    Artist Statement

    Time is always not enough, but it is only true when we have things to do. Artist residency is an experience of time travel. Once you step into another culture, far away from your own. Suddenly you realize that you have to learn from the very beginning, from the basic understanding of daily life. It recalls memories of childhood, of youth and of future. Nothing is necessary to be done. Just stay in the studio, which is very spacious compared to that I had in Hong Kong, allows a lot of solitary thought to fill up until your back feel painful with the chair. The spacetime is open. ‘Time is an illusion.’ – Albert Einstein

    After arriving Busan for a month, mostly I stay in the area nearby Hong-ti Art Center. It is an industrial area where things are made. There is not much traffic. In a foreign place, most fundamental elements become sentiments. The air, the light and shadows, the sea, the ambient sound, the fallen leaves and the sense of time seems dilated. To start from a personal perspective, I couldn’t help but reflect on my life in Hong Kong. I hope to describe the feeling of living here from Hong Kong.

    One touristic attraction in my studio is definitely the sunlight. Here I could see the same ‘light drawing’ on the wall and the floor from 8am to 3:30pm in my studio. Outside there are different trees and plants filling up the window scene. It is somehow rare in Hong Kong, at least in my neighbourhood. It might sound awkward to you, but the residential life in Hong Kong are mostly in a high-rise, far off the ground. Still, the windows are blocked by the other buildings so you hardly see ‘light drawing’ on the walls and shadows of trees in your flat.

    The sense of timelessness may not be a thing of Busan, but certainly for me in Hong-ti.

     

    Exhibition view
    1

    2

    3

    4

    2_

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

     

  • Piccoloministr. 316

    Goethe-Gallery and Black Box Studio, Goethe-Institut Hongkong, Hong Kong
    11–31 May 2016

    Piccoloministr. 316 — exhibition overview

    Afternoons

    View the work

    Afternoons — booklets displayed across the exhibition tables
    Afternoons — detail of an open booklet and printed light

    Light from Window

    Paint on wall, 250 × 250 cm. Painted by Hye Kyoung Kwon.

    Light from Window — painted light beside the doorway

    Work Report for Museum Ludwig

    Read about the work

    Work Report for Museum Ludwig — two framed photo-text sequences above the display tables

    Photographs

    Digital prints on wallpaper, 60 × 60 cm.

    Photographs and booklet tables in the exhibition
    Photograph of a lit interior
    Photograph of a window
    Photograph of trees in mist

    Reports

    Attendance Report for Academy of Media Arts Cologne

    Attendance Report displayed in its frame

    Passenger Report for Meinfernbus

    Passenger Report for Meinfernbus — concertina booklet on a wall shelf

    In the Room

    Video projection and sound.

    In the Room — installation view

    Exhibition catalogue

    The cover and two selected spreads introduce the publication without repeating the entire catalogue.

    Piccoloministr. 316 — exhibition catalogue cover
    Selected catalogue spread introducing the exhibition and Afternoons
    Selected catalogue spread with photographs and installation images
  • 沉靜的日常

    Media. 明周
    Date. 2016-06-04
    Page. 24
    Text. 蔡倩怡
    Photo. 梁俊棋

    方琛宇: 沉靜的日常

    第一次看方琛宇 (Silas) 的錄像作品,是在展覽裏佔據整幅牆的投影幕,三個畫面並置,以定鏡長時間拍攝扶手電梯。偌大的畫面將電梯上行人的漠然神態表露無遺,同時也擷取了日常片刻,緩慢的流動影像如同將時間靜止凝固。

    我們在他的最新個展《比哥羅米尼街316號》(歌德學院主辦) 採訪,其中一件作品,是模擬半夜無眠坐在家裏沙發的經驗,如窗影的錄像投射在壁上並反覆移動,沙發下也放了喇叭,隱約能聽到夜半的竊竊私語。我們就坐在黑暗中談錄像。

    Silas畢業於香港浸會大學視覺藝術院,早年已專注於錄像創作。「因為video是time-based 的媒介,與時間有關而我喜歡探索日常經驗中時間是如何度過的。」因此我們不難看到Silas早期的作品總注視日常。《當門打開》以長鏡頭拍攝地鐵月台幕門前時間的瞬間流逝。《等待》悄悄拍下在時代廣場上等待着的人。Silas檢拾城市的時間碎片,再放大呈現。「我在拍攝時花很長時觀察,看着影機時也好像變得抽離了,在日常的場景裏靜待事情的發生,所以我的作品也有紀錄的成分。而利用錄像記錄日常生活也更能觀影與了解自己。」

    異殊的城市經驗

    Silas深諳時間在城市的特質──快速而珍貴,於是他便拍攝升降關門前的數秒,再將作品出售,每段片段只販賣一次,錄像中已出的部分會換成「已售—xx秒xxx元」的畫面。作品便稱作《販賣偷來的時間》。「錄像對我來說不是單純的形式,而是思考的媒介,讓我可以思索與日常生活的關係。」時間與日常秩序、以至商業的關係密不可分,他透露其中一件「不存在的作品」:「我曾經想過在亞視買下廣告時段,但不播放任何影像。因為我們平常收看電視上的廣告、新聞等,都不會思考,沒有對日常生活的自覺。」

    Silas的早期作品,除了與時間有關,也跟人很有密切關係。好像《跟踨陌生人》便探索網絡時代社交媒體上的「陌生人」是一種什麼概念。「我過去的作品確是充滿着人,但現在的作品不會直接拍攝人,只會感覺到人的存在。影像呈現的是經驗與感覺,以至腦內幻想。所以video可以說是全面的,不論虛實的形式,或立體與無形等所有事都能包納。」

    曾到德國唸書的Silas,對於生活經驗也更敏銳。現在的作品仍圍繞日常,更擅長探索日常的內在肌理。「有時在街上看到很多人拿着手機看片便會感到很有趣。我會想流動影像與外在空間的關作。從前我曾旁聽葉旭耀的課,他提到"Pre-cinema”的概念,例如皮影戲。而這亦啟發到我思考錄像藝術──它是整體的經驗,探現實空間與影像空間如何重疊。」

  • Under the Linden

    2016- Installation
    Direct UV inkjet print on roller blind, inkjet print mounted on translucent black acrylic plates

    200 x 140 cm; 180 x 90 cm, 90 x 90 cm (2 pcs)

    The room I lived was on the first floor of a building in a small quiet street. It was surrounded by towering trees with not much traffic. In winter, snow covered the trees and the roofs of the houses. In summer, the flourishing leaves almost pushed their way into the window. Sunlight fell into my room, casting on my table a blue and greenish shadow, swayed gently with the wind.

    The room I live is on the sixth floor of a high rise in an estate made up of ten blocks. The view from the window stays the same throughout the year. Tall concrete penetrates the hazy sky. In the small slit of the harbour view, I can see ships passing by. Sunlight also comes into my room, but it looks quite different. It is just the reflection from a window of the building opposite.

    One day I walked around the streets alone. I looked at people’s faces, but few looked back at me. They weren’t even aware. They don’t look around now. They may well be living a second life in another space and time. At some point I walked pass a tree and realised there was a big sky high above the black mirror.

    Exhibited in
    POST PiXEL. Animamix Biennale 2015 – 16, Run Run Shaw Creative Media Centre, Hong Kong

     

    椴樹底下
    2016-
    裝置
    捲簾上UV噴墨打印, 透光黑色亞加力膠片上噴墨打印
    200 x 140 厘米; 180 x 90 厘米, 90 x 90 厘米 (2 件)

    我住過的房間位於一條寂靜的小街上,就在樓房的第一層,被大樹包圍着,沒有太多車輛經過。冬天時屋頂和樹上都蓋着積雪;夏天時樹葉都快長到窗內。陽光射進房間裏,書桌上晃動着一叢藍綠色的影子。

    我住的房間位於十棟屋苑大廈其中一棟的六樓。窗外風景四季如一,石屎高聳入朦朧的半空,大廈之間的縫隙中還能看見海港上船隻駛過。儘管陽光也能走進我的房間,但看來頗為不同,因為這是對面大廈窗門反射過來的光線。

    有一天我在街上獨自游蕩,我凝望着路人的臉,但他們都沒有察覺,甚少有人回望,現在他們都不再四處看。或許他們可能在另一時空過着第二個人生。走過某棵樹下,發現黑色鏡子上還有一大片天空。

    展覽
    像素之後 動漫美學雙年展2015-16, 香港邵逸夫創意媒體中心

     

    Overview

    Reflection of the shadow from the roller blind, the ceiling and image of the table top

    DSC_5488_w

    DSC_5297_w

  • 展評:低緯度的不透明


    文 – 蔡影茜

    藝術論壇 2012-12-14

    廣州畫廊從選址到命名,都表明了一種廣東幫式的譜系學態度。對於廣州不大的當代藝術圈來說,這不僅僅是一個商業畫廊的開幕,亦意味著年輕藝術家對不同藝術生態的嘗試和開發。參加展覽的6位藝術家,除了劉茵之外,全部來自香港。展覽主題“低緯度的不透明”欲言又止,日常生活和文化的政治化幾乎消解了語言的紐帶作用,它並不能令即將到來的“一小時生活圈”單純美好起來。

    展廳入門右側地面上放著成排大小不一的電視屏幕,畫面上交替的黑夜和白晝截取自東京、香港、泰國和山東等地公共空間的網上監控視頻,作品題為《虛渡時光》 (2013),來自東莞出生、香港成長的藝術家黃永生。劉茵的暗黑系少女敘事在小畫幅手繪和緊湊的日常空間中往往得心應手,但延展到孤立的中幅布面丙烯上便被稀釋了,唯有少女們標誌性的大眼睛讓人無力。方琛宇2012年曾在觀察舍舉辦個展“連續劇”,她的《午後》(2015)是一套二十本的A5小書,包裹小書的黑色厚膠袋和小木桌,為藝術家個人記憶的私密性提供了物質載體。香港日益繁榮的博覽會、畫廊和藝術家工作室體係對於年輕藝術家的生涯極具塑造作用,曾為一線藝術家代筆的WT Ip則通過裝飾性極強的抽像畫面和自身的匿名策略回應了這一現狀。 MMI影像團隊將五台監視器放在高低不同的帶輪支架上,同步播放著《西遊記》角色的各種現成影像片段,包括上海美術電影製片廠於60年代拍攝的動畫片《大鬧天宮》,央視80年代拍攝的電視劇《西遊記》以及周星馳經典的《大話西遊》等等。配合精心剪輯的對白和聲效,推著監視器遊走的五位演員上演了一場以特定年代的大眾文化影像為臉譜的荒誕儀式。因為海關扣押的原因未能展出吳佳欣作品《海浪》,一再地提醒我們隔閡的真實存在,它橫亙於當代藝術共享的語言和圖像之上。

    原文: http://artforum.com.cn/archive/8849

  • Flat D, 6/F, Aldrich Garden

    CASE – Project Space of Photography, Academy of Media Arts Cologne
    18 Jun 2015– 22 Jun 2015

    Text by Anthony Yung

    Flat D, 6/F, Aldrich Garden’ is the title of this exhibition but also the artist’s home address. This implies a doubleness: an address is functional and indicative – as a concept, it is most commonly understandable – but at the same time it is also meaningless because it is not meant to help you to find the place, as for the audience of this exhibition it refers to a place so far away that it may as well not exist. Such a conceptual doubleness epitomizes Silas Fong’s artistic project in temporal experiences and psychological activities – things that are utterly personal, yet also entirely common.

    The address is also giving us hints with which to understand the exhibition: first of all, it brings us to Hong Kong. A global financial center built first by manufacturing industries (the predecessor of ‘the world’s factory’), then by financial-trading freedoms, the city likes to evaluate its business and its people in terms of productivity and efficiency. In this society of pragmatism, wasting time is no different to burning billnotes. Growing up here, people pick up an almost ethical obligation to spend time in the ‘correct way’, and for the younger generation to not do so is a major rebellion. With this context in mind, Fong’s works are actually a research on sheer unproductivity, on the moments that we learn to feel guilty and negative about. He questions if these moments really are worthless and whether our personal histories are not in fact constituted within all these ‘ahistorical times’.

    The address also brings us to Flat D, a piece that was first shown in the Hong Kong Art Centre in 2015. There, Fong had taken corner of the exhibition space and reconstructed it into his bedroom at home. He then invited visitors to spend ten minutes in this room. With the time set to precisely 10 minutes, and the fact that there was not anything at all in the room to look at or contemplate, visitors could do nothing but go with whatever came up their minds. Coming inside Flat D, their plans, their experiences of the day were interrupted, though voluntarily, and now they had to stop and think about the interrupted. Eventually, the piece provided an experience and a question: what does this interruption, these ten minutes that are cut out of our life, mean to us?

    Three other pieces within the exhibition (Work Report for Museum Ludwig, Attendance Report for Academy of Media Arts Cologne and Passenger Report for Meinfernbus) can be seen as elements of ‘fieldworks’ relating to such research – with pictures and texts, he documents the activities of his mind during long hours undertaking internship duties in a museum, attending classes and taking long bus rides. These records may remind us of the typical texts of ‘stream of consciousness’, in particular Camus’s Outsider, but literariness is not Fong’s main concern here. What he tries to explore is the common rather than the unique – he wants these records to remind us of our own experiences. Think about it, we all talk to ourselves during moments of boredom and distraction, when in our minds words start to flow randomly, unbounded from social norms (manners, ethics, and so on) and a chain of memories appears, no matter how irrelevant they are to the things immediately surrounding us. Using the artist’s own experiences as case studies, these pieces ask us to pay attention to these conversations we have with ourselves.

    Even two years ago, Fong was already a considerably experienced artist. Coming to ‘study’ in Germany, what is the most precious to him is perhaps not the new information to even methodologies, but the unfamiliar environment, a sense of distance and indifference that provokes thoughts and experiences. For as we can tell from these works, the core theme of Fong’s practice is an inevitable loneliness, and art is a tool to process and transcend it and make us understand ourselves better. In this sense, we may see the last work in this exhibition as a beautiful metaphor – Afternoons (2015) is a series of books, but books with no words, no knowledge, no ‘history’ – just the sunlight that changes as time goes by. It symbolizes what Fong attempts to create with art: a sensitivity to the subtleties of our time and our mind.

    德國科隆媒體藝術學院CASE攝影項目空間
    2015年6月18 – 22 日

    文章 – 翁子健

    「愛蝶灣6樓D室」是方琛宇這次展覽的題目,但也是他家的地址。這個雙重性的意味在於:作為一個普通的概念,地址是功能性及指示性的,但以這個地址命名一個在科隆發生的展覽,這個地址便不再有任何實用意義,因為作為題目它不是為了讓人去尋找這個具體的地點,對於觀看這次展覽的人來說,甚至這個地點是否存在也不要緊。這種雙重性正是方琛宇創作中的核心命題:那些既是完全私密的、又同時極盡人所共知的事。

    這個地址當然也是一個提示,幫助我們去理解這個展覽:首先,它指向香港,全球金融中心,曾經的「世界工廠」的大腦,以貿易自由聞名,一個以效率和生產力作為最高評判標準的地方。這個務實的社會篤信時間就是金錢。在這兒成長的人自然而然地帶有一種道理的責任感:必須以「正確」的方式利用時間,而浪費時間就是一種反叛。從這個角度看,不妨將方琛宇的創作理解為一種對反生產力的研究,是對於那些令人罪疚和難受的不事生產的時刻之探討。他的追問是:難道我們的個人歷史不是由無數的這些「非歷史性時間」構成的嗎?這些時刻怎麼可能會毫無意義呢?

    這個地址也指向《D室》,那是這次展覽上的一件作品,2015年在香港藝術中心第一次展出。當時,方利用了展覽的一個角落,將之改造,仿製成自己家中睡房。展覽期間,他邀請觀眾每人獨自在房間內等待10分鐘,房門鎖上,任何計時工具都不得帶上。觀眾知道他將會在房中等待10分鐘,但是房間裡沒有任何值得一看的東西,他們只能把注意力放在自己的頭腦內。他們的日程計劃,他們的體驗,好比是突然被中斷了一下,儘管他們是自願參與這件事的,但是他們也不得不停下來,面對這個中斷。這就是這個作品的核心命題:這個沒有理由的中斷,這10分鐘裡的發生的事情,它意味著什麼?在未來我們還會記得它嗎?

    當下這次展覽的其他三件作品可被視為方的研究之考察素材。他以圖片及文字記錄了他在美術館實習值班時,在上課時,和在長途巴士上的心理活動。這些文字可能會有點像經典的意識流小說,尤其是卡謬的《局外人》,但是文學性不是方關心的問題。方要探討的是一種普遍的東西,而不是一些特殊的私人經驗。試想:在沉悶和分神時,我們是否都會在頭腦裡跟自己說話?我們都跟自己說了些什麼?這些話是偶然的嗎?它們為什麼會出現,為什麼會這樣出現?它們可能還會出現得毫無約束,不顧任何社會的基本禮儀和道德。與當下情境毫無關係的記憶畫面也會浮現,我們都不知道此事此地為什麼會想起這些事。方以自己的經驗,希望探討的正是這些我們自己跟自己的對話。

    在來德國兩年之前,方在香港已是一位受到認可、有相當經驗的藝術家。對他而言,來德國讀書,最重要的肯定不是獲取新的資訊和方法,而是對一個陌生環境的體驗,一種距離感和冷漠感,因為孤獨正是方最感興趣的感受之一,他的創作也往往旨在處理及轉化孤獨,以達致對自我的更深刻的理解。從這個角度看,這次展覽的最後一件作品《午後》真可謂是一個美麗的比喻:《午後》是一本沒有文字,不記載任何知識和歷史的書,書中只有陽光的映照,隨著時間轉變形式。這大概象徵了方的藝術創作之要旨:自我對於時間和心靈的最為細緻的感受。

    Exhibition view







    Working Report for Museum Ludwig







    A photo of Flat D



    Passenger Report for Meinfernbus









    Attendance Report for Academy of Media Arts







    Afternoons












    Exhibition Catalogue








  • Flat D, 6/F, Aldrich Garden

    Anthony Yung

    Flat D, 6/F, Aldrich Garden’ is the title of this exhibition but also the artist’s home address. This implies a doubleness: an address is functional and indicative – as a concept, it is most commonly understandable – but at the same time it is also meaningless because it is not meant to help you to find the place, as for the audience of this exhibition it refers to a place so far away that it may as well not exist. Such a conceptual doubleness epitomizes Silas Fong’s artistic project in temporal experiences and psychological activities – things that are utterly personal, yet also entirely common.

    The address is also giving us hints with which to understand the exhibition: first of all, it brings us to Hong Kong. A global financial center built first by manufacturing industries (the predecessor of ‘the world’s factory’), then by financial-trading freedoms, the city likes to evaluate its business and its people in terms of productivity and efficiency. In this society of pragmatism, wasting time is no different to burning billnotes. Growing up here, people pick up an almost ethical obligation to spend time in the ‘correct way’, and for the younger generation to not do so is a major rebellion. With this context in mind, Fong’s works are actually a research on sheer unproductivity, on the moments that we learn to feel guilty and negative about. He questions if these moments really are worthless and whether our personal histories are not in fact constituted within all these ‘ahistorical times’.

    The address also brings us to Flat D, a piece that was first shown in the Hong Kong Art Centre in 2015. There, Fong had taken corner of the exhibition space and reconstructed it into his bedroom at home. He then invited visitors to spend ten minutes in this room. With the time set to precisely 10 minutes, and the fact that there was not anything at all in the room to look at or contemplate, visitors could do nothing but go with whatever came up their minds. Coming inside Flat D, their plans, their experiences of the day were interrupted, though voluntarily, and now they had to stop and think about the interrupted. Eventually, the piece provided an experience and a question: what does this interruption, these ten minutes that are cut out of our life, mean to us?

    Three other pieces within the exhibition (Work Report for Museum Ludwig, Attendance Report for Academy of Media Arts Cologne and Passenger Report for Meinfernbus) can be seen as elements of ‘fieldworks’ relating to such research – with pictures and texts, he documents the activities of his mind during long hours undertaking internship duties in a museum, attending classes and taking long bus rides. These records may remind us of the typical texts of ‘stream of consciousness’, in particular Camus’s Outsider, but literariness is not Fong’s main concern here. What he tries to explore is the common rather than the unique – he wants these records to remind us of our own experiences. Think about it, we all talk to ourselves during moments of boredom and distraction, when in our minds words start to flow randomly, unbounded from social norms (manners, ethics, and so on) and a chain of memories appears, no matter how irrelevant they are to the things immediately surrounding us. Using the artist’s own experiences as case studies, these pieces ask us to pay attention to these conversations we have with ourselves.

    Even two years ago, Fong was already a considerably experienced artist. Coming to ‘study’ in Germany, what is the most precious to him is perhaps not the new information to even methodologies, but the unfamiliar environment, a sense of distance and indifference that provokes thoughts and experiences. For as we can tell from these works, the core theme of Fong’s practice is an inevitable loneliness, and art is a tool to process and transcend it and make us understand ourselves better. In this sense, we may see the last work in this exhibition as a beautiful metaphor – Afternoons (2015) is a series of books, but books with no words, no knowledge, no ‘history’ – just the sunlight that changes as time goes by. It symbolizes what Fong attempts to create with art: a sensitivity to the subtleties of our time and our mind.

    ‘Flat D, 6/F, Aldrich Garden’ is a text written for the exhibition with the same title.

  • Passenger Report for Meinfernbus

    2015 Photo-Text
    Digital Print on papers, wooden shelf
    170 cm x 22 cm  x 16 cm



    Full Text

  • Attendance Report for Academy of Media Arts Cologne

    2015 · Photo-text · Digital print on newspaper
    75 × 52 cm, double-sided. Edition of 100, distributed at the Academy of Media Arts Cologne.

    Exhibited in Flat D, 6/F, Aldrich Garden, CASE – Project Room of Photography, Academy of Media Arts Cologne, 2015.

    繁體中文 · 藝術學院出席報告

    2015 · 相片、文字
    報紙上數碼印刷,75 × 52 厘米,雙面。印製100份,於科隆媒體藝術學院派發。

    展覽:《愛蝶灣6樓D室》,科隆媒體藝術學院攝影項目空間,2015。

    另有數碼印刷版本,82 × 62 厘米,金色磨砂鋁框。

    Attendance Report — newspaper front
    Attendance Report — newspaper reverse
    Attendance Report distributed at the academy entrance
    At the main entrance during Rundgang.
    Newspaper displayed at the academy
    Attendance Report in the academy library
    Attendance Report displayed among newspapers at the Academy of Media Arts Cologne library.
    Displayed alongside other newspapers in the Academy of Media Arts Cologne library.

    Framed print

    Digital print, 82 × 62 cm, in a gold matte aluminium frame.

    Attendance Report — framed print and exhibition view
    Attendance Report — framed print and exhibition view
    Attendance Report — framed print and exhibition view

    Read the full text (PDF)

  • Flat D

    Download PDF
    2015 Durational Installation
    Table, grey plastic tray, watch, attendant in formal wear, wooden door, soundproof walls and ceiling, laminate flooring, wall skirting, aluminum window with sanded glass, air-conditioner, wall paint, steel wall hanger, curtain, light bulb, kinetic light system
    300 cm x 220 cm x 250 cm, 10 minutes

    In front of a door, there is a person sitting on a chair. When you get close, this person greets you and asks if you want to enter. However, you are only allowed to enter individually, without your mobile phone, camera, electronic devices and books, etc. After you enter, the door is locked and is only unlocked after 10 minutes. You would sign an agreement to confirm your decision at your own risk. Inquiries about what is behind the door would not be answered. Every visitor is only allowed to enter the door once for the whole exhibition period.

    There is overwhelming information all around that numbs our senses. We are constantly forced to fool our basic observation of our daily life surroundings. In urban city life like Hong Kong, it’s almost impossible to be alone. We are always occupied and distracted. With mobile communications, it gets even “better”. This can hinder our understanding of ourselves and our needs. The work explores whether solitude and boredom can open space for reflection and creativity. It offers a solitary, meditative experience, free from social pressure, as an invitation to inner exploration.

    Exhibited in
    《The 20th ifva Awards – Media Art Category Finalist Exhibition》
    Pao Galleries Hong Kong Art Centre, Hong Kong, 2015
    An attendant seated beside the entrance and belongings tray for Flat D
    An attendant sits next to the entrance of Flat D to control the operation.

    Grey tray for visitors to leave their belongings before entering Flat D
    A grey tray is used for visitors to leave their belongings (mobile phone, camera, watch, etc.).

    Visitor agreement and timekeeping watch for Flat D
    Visitors are obliged to read the agreement carefully before entering Flat D. A watch is used for the attendant to keep time.

    The attendant locking the door after a visitor enters Flat D
    The attendant locks the door after the visitor has entered Flat D.

    Light falling across the wall and floor inside Flat D
    Light from outside the window scatters on the wall and the floor. It changes slowly across the room.

    57 8 Air conditioner inside Flat D
    Air conditioner creates an atmosphere with ambient mechanical sound, temperature and humidity.

    Flat D interior as the room becomes darker
    Sometimes the room turns darker.

    11 12 13 14 15

    Instructional/Documentation Video